Martin v City of Boise

"[O]ur holding does not cover individuals who do have access to adequate temporary shelter, whether because they have the means to pay for it or because it is realistically available to them for free, but who choose not to use it."

– Martin v City of Boise, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal

Be the first to comment

Or sign in with email

    Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.